Why do all Bibles end with the book of Revelation? Although some sects consider more recent writings to be inspired, nobody has dared to add such writings to the Bible. Why not? It must be that deep down they know that the apostolic writings are in a class by themselves. And they are. The Holy Spirit exhorts us to “contend for the faith which was once delivered” (Jude 3). “From the start of the church, they continued steadfastly in the apostles’ doctrine” (Acts 2:42) Why? Because “Jesus had promised the apostles that when He, the Spirit of truth is come He will guide you into all truth” (John 16:13).
All truth. Therefore, when all the apostles were dead, there was no more truth to be revealed, no more books worthy of being considered scripture. Catholics and Protestants debate about which books should be included in the OT, but all agree upon the 27 books of the NT. John wrote the final five inspired books.
Indeed, the apostle Paul had predicted that finality. In the great love chapter, I Corinthians 13, the Holy Spirit predicted: “Whether there are prophecies, they will fail; whether there are tongues, they will cease; whether there is knowledge, it will vanish away” (1 3:8).
Some sincerely ask, “Has knowledge passed away?” No, of course not. However, I Corinthians 12, 13 and 14 are discussing the nine inspired spiritual gifts (charisma) in the infant church. Prophecies, tongues and knowledge are three of the nine listed in 12:8-10. Inspired knowledge, as one of the nine spiritual gifts, was to vanish away. The same is true of prophecy. Prophecies exist today – the written prophecies made in the first century (and before). We have no new inspired knowledge today, no new prophecies. Our 27 NT books contain it all.
Some of the language in I Corinthians 13 can give the impression that these three gifts, representing the nine, would be done away at the Second Coming. A major reason why that interpretation is difficult for me to accept is what the text says about faith and hope: “And now abide faith, hope, love.” We can all agree that love is not only the greatest, as Paul also says, but that it is also eternal. Not so with faith and hope. Consider:
FAIL, CEASE, VANISH (being in part) – Prophecies, Tongues, Knowledge. NOW ABIDE (until Jesus comes) – Faith, Hope. ETERNAL (and greatest) – Love.
Three things fail, cease, vanish. Three things now abide. How long do faith and hope abide? Until the end of the world. Hebrews 11:1 says that faith is “the evidence of things not seen” 2 Corinthians 5:7 says, “We walk by faith, not by sight.” I John 3:2 says “When he shall appear, him; for we shall see him as he is.” In glory we will see Him!… no more faith. It will be a sight! And what of hope? Romans 8:24 clarifies: “Hope that is seen is not hope: for who hopes for that which he sees?” Paul is saying that in this world prophecy, tongues and knowledge are temporary; faith and hope are permanent and love trumps them all.
Since faith and hope ‘abide’ until Jesus comes, the ceasing of prophecies, tongues and knowledge must take place before that. When? Paul did not specify a date. Rather, he indicated a condition. “For we know in part, and we prophesy in part. But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away” (I Corinthians 13:9-10). The Greek for ‘perfect’ here (teleios) may be translated ‘finished, complete or perfect’. Since ‘in part’ is contrasted to ‘teleios’, it would seem that ‘complete’ or ‘finished’ would be a better translation than ‘perfect’. Knowledge and prophecy were complete with the final writings of John; thus the temporary in part gifts of knowledge and prophecy were done away, no longer needed.
Does ‘face to face’ in verse 12 refer to seeing God in heaven after the Second Coming? Aside from this verse, ‘face to face’ in the NT is only used of human relationships. In the OT, ‘face to face’ seven times describes relations between God and man. Since Jesus said “No man has seen God at any time” (John 1:18), the term ‘face to face’ could not mean to actually see God. These OT texts all tell of some intimate relationship with God in the here and now, not in eternity. Thus, ‘face to face’ in I Corinthians 13 would seem to mean an intimate relationship with God through His completed Word.
I Corinthians 13:11 contrasts a child with a man. Does not scripture frequently teach us to grow beyond childhood toward maturity in this life? Notice one such contrast in 14:20: “in malice be children, but in understanding be men (teleios)”. Other versions render ‘teleios’ here as ‘mature’. This is the same Greek word as ‘perfect’ in 13:10. In 13:9-11 we can see the young church with its partial temporary gifts contrasted with a mature church having the finalized Holy Scriptures, which offer God’s completed message to us. The gift of prophecy came to an end in the first century. The Bible contains all there is of God’s inspired prophecy for us today.